Peer Review Process

Peer Review Process

All articles are first reviewed by the Editor. This evaluation includes the focus and scope of the journal, the level of similarity, and the journal template. Similarity results below 20% will proceed to the reviewer. If it does not meet the requirements, the article will be immediately returned to the author. The checking process is still manual. After passing the initial review process, the article will be sent to at least 2 reviewers using the Double blind peer review policy. All comments from reviewers will be sent to the corresponding email listed on each article. The editor will provide information to the author regarding the final results of the assessment no later than 60 days after the paper is submitted. Peer reviewers have the right to provide some feedback to the authors to encourage the quality of the manuscript and provide input on editorial policies according to their respective expertise. The editor's final decision regarding the article is decided based on the final evaluation results of the journal editorial team meeting. Furthermore, the editor will send the final assessment results to the author via email.

Willingness

Peer reviewers must inform the editor of their willingness to review the manuscript for publication. If unwilling, the peer reviewer must inform the editor.

Confidentiality

The reviewed manuscript is a confidential document. Communication with other parties without authorization is prohibited.

Standard objectivity

Peer reviewers should adhere to the principles of objectivity and avoid personal criticism of manuscript authors during the review process. All comments should be accompanied by clear and supportive suggestions.

Reference Clarity

Peer reviewers are recommended to provide information to authors with relevant literature, or case studies that have not been cited, have substantial similarity or overlap with the manuscript under review.

Conflict of interest

Peer reviewers are not permitted to use unpublished manuscript materials for personal use without the written consent of the authors, under any circumstances. The information and ideas contained in the reviewed manuscript are confidential and should not be distributed or used for personal gain. If there is a conflict of interest due to reasons of competition, collaboration, or other relationships with authors, institutions or companies involved in publishing, peer reviewers are not permitted to evaluate related manuscripts.